Home » news » The Silent Conspiracy: How Regulators and Corporations Control Your Health

The Silent Conspiracy: How Regulators and Corporations Control Your Health

by Brian Rogers

The mainstream regulatory landscape, involving entities like the FDA, LegitScript, Meta, and Google, has often been perceived as a guardian of public health and safety. However, a closer examination reveals stark similarities to the much-maligned underground steroid forums. Both realms operate under the guise of safeguarding interests but ultimately guide the public down highly profitable paths that benefit them financially, often at the expense of genuine healthcare needs.

The Illusion of Protection: Both the U.S. government and private entities like LegitScript exert considerable control over what health-related information reaches the public. This control is reminiscent of underground forums, which manipulate discussions and promote certain products or vendors that align with their financial interests. In the mainstream, this manipulation is cloaked under the legitimacy of safety and regulation, yet the primary beneficiaries are often pharmaceutical giants and tech conglomerates whose interests lie in maintaining market dominance and profit margins.

  • Censorship and Control: Just as underground forums dictate conversations to promote specific products, mainstream entities censor and filter information to protect their financial interests. This censorship can prevent consumers from accessing affordable generic medications from WHO-certified plants in India.

Financial Motives Over Health: The FDA, along with big pharma, has a vested interest in controlling the pharmaceutical market. This control extends to restricting access to affordable generic medications, such as those produced in WHO-certified plants in India, which are often blocked from the U.S. market not due to quality concerns but because of commercial interests. The narrative pushed by entities like Google and Meta follows a similar trajectory, shaped by those who pay to control the platform’s regulatory levers.

  • Economic Interests: The high cost of medications in the U.S. benefits pharmaceutical companies. These companies use their influence to maintain restrictive policies that limit competition from more affordable international sources, ensuring their continued profitability.

Restrictive Practices: The practice of restricting access to affordable medication mirrors the tactics of illegal steroid forums, where information and access are tightly controlled to benefit a select few. For instance, the prohibition against importing cost-effective generic drugs for personal use is akin to how underground forums might restrict access to only their sponsored products, which are not necessarily the best or most affordable.

  • Barrier to Access: Regulations that prevent the importation of affordable generics are designed to protect profits rather than public health, much like the closed ecosystems of underground forums that promote specific vendors.

Violation of Free Speech: The control over information by entities like LegitScript and supported by digital giants like Google and Meta represents a significant overreach, akin to censorship. This restriction is a violation of free speech, particularly when it comes to health information. The right to access comprehensive health information and make informed decisions is fundamental, yet it is being eroded under the guise of regulation and safety.

  • Censorship: By restricting what can be discussed or advertised online, these entities limit the public’s ability to access critical health information and alternative treatments, thus infringing on free speech.

The Case for Change: For routine medications, such as erectile dysfunction pills or antibiotics, there is no justification for the stringent barriers that prevent their importation from reputable sources abroad. The case of an elderly person needing basic medication without the hassle of multiple doctor visits illustrates the unnecessary complexity and expense injected into the system by current regulations.

  • Unnecessary Complexity: The current regulatory environment creates unnecessary hurdles for obtaining routine medications, exacerbating health inequities and financial burdens on consumers.

The Role of Ashvin Medicara: Unlike many verification entities that operate for profit, Ashvin Medicara is a not-for-profit organization committed to transparent and open access to pharmaceutical information. Our mission is to educate and facilitate access to quality medications, advocating for regulatory reforms that allow for personal importation of a set quantity of common pharmaceuticals from verified, reputable sources.

  • Advocacy and Education: Ashvin Medicara strives to provide accurate, unbiased information and supports regulatory changes that prioritize consumer access to affordable medications.

Conclusion: The similarities between the control exercised by the U.S. government, big pharma, and tech giants, and the dynamics of underground steroid forums, highlight a troubling convergence of interests that prioritize profit over public health. It’s time to challenge these practices openly and to advocate for a system that genuinely prioritizes the health and freedom of the individual.

Call to Action: Join us in pushing for regulatory reform that recognizes the rights of individuals to access affordable, effective medication. Support Ashvin Medicara in our fight to ensure that freedom of information and health equity are not just ideals but realities for everyone. Together, we can dismantle the barriers that restrict access to essential medications and champion a more just and transparent healthcare system.

Citations:

  • “FDA Personal Importation Policy,” U.S. Food and Drug Administration, retrieved from https://www.fda.gov
  • “WHO Certification and Indian Pharmacies,” World Health Organization, retrieved from https://www.who.int
  • “Importation of Prescription Drugs,” U.S. Customs and Border Protection, retrieved from https://www.cbp.gov
  • “Consumer Safety in Online Pharmacy Transactions,” National Association of Boards of Pharmacy, retrieved from https://www.nabp.pharmacy
  • “The Influence of Pharmaceutical Companies on FDA Policy,” Journal of the American Medical Association, retrieved from https://jamanetwork.com

Related Posts

Leave a Comment

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?
-
00:00
00:00
Update Required Flash plugin
-
00:00
00:00